Over the past decade, Indonesia has emerged as a vibrant player in the global startup conversation. With a large, youthful population and rapid digital adoption, many believed the country could become a launchpad for the next generation of global tech champions. The ambition to be home to a world-class, category-defining enterprise has resonated strongly across government initiatives, venture capital roadshows, and founder narratives. The idea of building a global startup from Indonesia has not lacked vision or enthusiasm.
Yet when we shift from aspiration to execution, the gaps become clear. Creating a globally competitive company from within Indonesia is not simply a matter of ambition or local market size. It involves navigating an ecosystem that remains constrained by structural bottlenecks: capital access, talent depth, legal infrastructure, and operational complexity. How to build a global company from Indonesia is a question that requires hard trade-offs, often beyond the control of founders themselves.
For many Indonesian startups going global, the most strategic path involves establishing key operations in Singapore. This is not about abandoning roots, but about aligning with international systems that support scale. Understanding these dynamics is essential for any serious conversation about what global success truly means when starting from a frontier market like Indonesia.
"You can build local with local talent, but scaling globally requires global depth."
The Mirage of Local Success: Valuations Without Victory
Over the past decade, Indonesia has seen a surge of tech companies rise to national and regional prominence. Brands like Gojek, Tokopedia, Bukalapak, Traveloka, and Xendit have become household names and symbols of the country’s digital ambitions. These startups attracted significant foreign capital, gained media attention, and helped cultivate an early ecosystem of tech-savvy professionals. In doing so, they created the perception that building a global startup from Indonesia was not just possible, but imminent.
Yet this wave of visibility masked deeper challenges. Most of these companies have struggled to build profitable business models. They remain dependent on venture capital subsidies to sustain operations and scale. Expansion beyond Southeast Asia has proven difficult, with many unable to adapt their offerings to more competitive or regulated global markets. Their high valuations, while impressive on paper, often reflected investor enthusiasm for exposure to Indonesia’s market potential rather than the companies’ underlying performance.
At a structural level, many of these “Indonesian” companies have, in practice, shifted key aspects of their business offshore. This includes their legal incorporation, banking relationships, executive leadership, and intellectual property holdings. Singapore, in particular, has become the preferred destination, highlighting the practical reality behind the Indonesia vs Singapore startup ecosystem debate. Even companies that are operationally embedded in Indonesia often rely on Singapore to manage cross-border funding, governance, and risk.
This pattern extends beyond tech. Large Indonesian conglomerates in sectors like agribusiness and energy follow similar structures, prioritizing predictability and access to international systems. Should Indonesian startups move to Singapore? For many founders and investors, the logic is difficult to ignore. It is not a question of abandoning Indonesia, but of enabling scalability in a global context.
Ultimately, the optics of success can be deceiving. What appears local may, in truth, be globally structured by necessity.
The Structural Bottlenecks: Capital, Talent, and Legal Realities
The ambition of building a global startup from Indonesia is supported by undeniable macroeconomic strengths. With a population exceeding 280 million, rising internet penetration, and a growing middle class, the country has the demand-side fundamentals to incubate large-scale digital businesses. For early-stage founders, Indonesia offers a fertile ground to test products, grow a user base, and generate traction.
However, these advantages begin to taper as companies look beyond domestic markets and prepare for international expansion. At that point, founders must navigate three persistent structural bottlenecks that consistently limit the ability of Indonesian startups going global to maintain their roots while scaling.
Capital Constraints
Local funding has improved markedly over the last decade. Seed and Series A capital is now accessible through a growing network of Indonesian and regional venture capital firms. Yet for companies raising Series B or beyond, the reality shifts. Most global investors require companies to be domiciled in jurisdictions with robust legal protections, tax transparency, and clear exit paths. These are areas where Indonesia is still evolving.
As a result, many high-growth startups face pressure to incorporate in Singapore, the Cayman Islands, or Delaware in order to unlock follow-on capital. This is not simply about convenience. Investors want legal certainty, enforceable shareholder rights, and predictable tax outcomes. Without these, term sheets often stall. The consequence is that much of the ownership, control, and economic upside of these companies begins to flow outward. What starts as a local innovation gradually becomes externally governed.
Talent Limitations
Indonesia’s talent pool is growing, energetic, and highly motivated. For early operations, the country offers capable engineers, marketers, and operators. But scaling to a global standard requires more. Senior technical architects, enterprise-grade product leaders, international marketing heads, and seasoned CFOs are still in limited supply. Finding this level of expertise within Indonesia remains difficult.
Attracting foreign specialists adds another layer of complexity. For experienced global professionals evaluating their next move, the question of Startup HQ: Jakarta or Singapore? is not hard to answer. Singapore offers clarity, infrastructure, and lifestyle advantages that Indonesia, despite its vibrancy, cannot yet match.
Regulatory and Legal Ambiguity
Operating at global scale demands a stable, transparent legal framework. Here, Indonesia continues to present friction. Visa policies remain inconsistent and bureaucratic. Data sovereignty and protection laws are still developing. Regulatory approval processes are often opaque. These issues do not just slow execution; they introduce material risk.
For founders trying to build a global startup from Indonesia, this legal uncertainty creates drag at every stage. By contrast, ecosystems like Singapore provide smoother legal rails and are explicitly designed to accommodate high-growth, cross-border companies. It is no surprise that many Indonesian founders feel compelled to shift structure offshore, not out of disloyalty, but necessity.
In short, while Indonesia excels at producing ambitious startups, the structural gaps in capital, talent, and legal maturity continue to shape where—and how—those startups scale globally.
The Illusion of Loyalty: Why Going Offshore Isn’t Betrayal
The decision to relocate parts of a business offshore, particularly to Singapore, is often met with criticism. For some, it signals a lack of commitment to the local ecosystem or an abandonment of national identity. But this view fails to recognise the deeper strategic realities involved in building a global startup from Indonesia. What may appear as disloyalty is more often a response to practical constraints rather than a rejection of roots.
Global expansion requires a certain foundation: legal predictability, protection of intellectual property, ease of capital flow, and access to international talent. These are not luxuries; they are non-negotiables for a startup attempting to scale beyond its home market. At present, Singapore provides this infrastructure in a way that Indonesia does not. It is no surprise, then, that many founders choose to incorporate or operate from there. The question of should Indonesian startups move to Singapore is not about abandoning values, but about enabling viability and growth.
Relocating certain business functions offshore does not preclude long-term value creation for Indonesia. On the contrary, startups that succeed globally often create jobs, upskill local talent, and foster second-generation founders. They serve as proof points that an Indonesian-origin company can compete and win at an international level.
The real risk lies in forcing companies into a binary choice between staying local and going global. That framing pushes founders into silence or shadows, quietly shifting value offshore without transparency or shared benefit. A more realistic and constructive approach accepts that Indonesian startups going global may need to operate through Singapore or other international hubs. What matters is not the mailing address on a term sheet, but how much value these companies ultimately return to their ecosystem, employees, and future entrepreneurs.
Rethinking What It Means to Build from Indonesia
The ambition of building a global startup from Indonesia needs to be matched with a flexible, modern understanding of what building “from” a place truly means. In a world where companies are born distributed, scale across borders, and hire talent remotely, the idea that every critical function must remain onshore no longer reflects operational reality. Rather than holding onto an outdated model of full localization, it is time to embrace hybrid strategies that allow Indonesian startups to scale globally while still delivering meaningful impact at home.
One such strategy is a remote-first, Jakarta-centered model. In this approach, companies can retain their cultural identity and leadership vision within Indonesia, while maintaining core operations in cities like Jakarta, Bandung, or Bali. At the same time, they can tap into international talent pools and capital markets by establishing globally distributed teams and legal entities abroad. This model allows for scalability without sacrificing local DNA.
Another viable path is through sectoral focus, where Indonesia builds global relevance by leaning into areas of comparative advantage. Sectors such as blue economy technologies, halal consumer products, and tropical agri-tech offer Indonesia an edge few others can replicate. From this position, Indonesian startups going global can offer solutions to challenges faced across other emerging and climate-vulnerable markets.
Importantly, this shift in mindset also requires support from policymakers. Instead of evaluating a startup’s value by the location of its legal incorporation, regulators and ecosystem builders should focus on where the long-term benefits flow. Local job creation, talent development, knowledge transfer, and reinvestment into the ecosystem are more meaningful indicators of national contribution.
The next generation of global companies will not be judged solely by where they are based, but by how they operate, whom they empower, and what systems they help build. Indonesia can be their starting point—but not their only boundary.
Indonesia is well-positioned to contribute more meaningfully to the global innovation landscape, but doing so requires a clear-eyed view of current constraints. The notion that one can build a global startup from Indonesia without compromise is often disconnected from operational reality. Successful founders must navigate complex trade-offs, many of which involve structural decisions about capital, talent, and jurisdiction.
True success should not be judged by a company’s registered address, but by the value it creates and how that value is distributed. Indonesian startups going global can still serve national interests, even if they expand from international hubs like Singapore. In fact, global reach often amplifies local impact—bringing jobs, expertise, and capital back into the ecosystem.
A more grounded form of entrepreneurial patriotism is emerging. It is not defined by remaining physically anchored, but by delivering outcomes that strengthen Indonesia’s economy and innovation capabilities. That might mean incorporating abroad, hiring leadership from outside the region, or structuring operations across multiple countries.
What matters most is that Indonesian founders continue building companies that push boundaries and inspire others to do the same. To compete globally, the system must adapt. To lead globally, founders must think beyond borders.
You know where your startup is going. We help you build the team that gets it there.
We help founders build executive teams and organisational frameworks that are ready for scale, from Jakarta to Singapore and beyond. Book a discovery call