Recent high-profile controversies involving fake degrees in Indonesia have brought renewed scrutiny to hiring practices in both public and private sectors. These cases, involving everyone from political leaders to corporate professionals, are not anomalies. They are signs of a much larger issue: HR hiring mistakes that result from weak verification protocols, rushed recruitment processes, and a culture that often prioritizes appearances over substance.
This is not merely a matter of candidate dishonesty. It reflects a broader failure within organizations to build robust hiring systems that can detect and act on recruitment red flags. Too often, HR teams rely on surface-level CV reviews and unchecked credentials, assuming honesty where there should be confirmation. The result is predictable: individuals with fraudulent qualifications or exaggerated work experience slip through undetected, setting a dangerous precedent for others to follow.
The real concern lies in the normalization of these lapses. When poor hiring practices are repeated and left unchallenged, they become the organizational standard. Yet, this is a preventable problem. With modest improvements such as clear reference protocols, basic degree verification, and structured interview methods, companies can significantly reduce risk. The solution isn’t complex. It starts with taking the hiring process seriously and treating truth as non-negotiable.
"Recruitment red flags aren’t invisible. They’re often just ignored."
Credentialism Without Checks: The Fertile Ground for Fake Degrees in Indonesia
In Indonesia, formal academic credentials are more than qualifications; they are powerful symbols of credibility and upward mobility. A degree, particularly an S1 (Bachelor’s degree), functions as a gatekeeper across industries. Whether in civil service, corporate environments, or even entry-level roles, the absence of such a credential often disqualifies candidates before their skills are even considered. This has fostered a culture where the appearance of qualification often outweighs actual capability.
Unfortunately, this credential-heavy hiring landscape is not accompanied by the same rigour in verification. The prevalence of fake degrees in Indonesia is not due to a lack of tools, but a widespread assumption that documentation is genuine. Many HR hiring mistakes stem from this blind trust. Diploma copies are accepted at face value. Reference checks rarely explore educational background, focusing instead on soft skills or interpersonal fit. The structure of higher education itself adds to the issue, with thousands of decentralized institutions and no single, accessible verification system.
This environment creates an easy opening for fraud. Candidates quickly realise that if they present well and list the “right” degree, the chances of being questioned are low. Once one person succeeds through this route, others follow. Inside organisations, peers observe that exaggeration or misrepresentation is not only tolerated but often rewarded. Over time, inflated qualifications become part of the norm, rather than an exception.
This isn’t simply a matter of fraud, but a failure in system design. By overvaluing degrees and undervaluing verification, companies unintentionally encourage misrepresentation. It’s a feedback loop that can only be broken when employers match their credential expectations with consistent, practical checks. Fake degrees in Indonesia will continue to thrive until hiring cultures change to prioritise truth over assumption.
Fake Experience and Inflated CVs: The Other Half of the Risk
While fake degrees in Indonesia receive the bulk of public attention, fabricated or inflated work experience presents an equally serious and often more pervasive threat. Unlike educational credentials, which at least leave a paper trail, professional experience is harder to verify, particularly when candidates are strategic about how they present it. A polished CV, confident interview presence, and carefully curated references can easily mask significant gaps or exaggerations.
The issue lies not just in candidate misrepresentation, but in the lack of depth in verification practices. Reference calls are frequently treated as formalities. They confirm employment dates, offer vague character endorsements, and rarely dig into the substance of the role. HR teams often fail to validate reporting lines, actual responsibilities, or project outcomes, and instead rely on surface-level confirmation.
This opens the door to familiar recruitment red flags. Candidates may list inflated job titles that suggest more seniority than they actually held. They may reference small or now-defunct companies that are difficult to trace. Referees are sometimes colleagues or even friends, not actual supervisors. In other cases, employment dates are manipulated to cover gaps or suggest longer tenure.
What’s most concerning is that many of these issues would unravel with just a few well-structured questions and a brief cross-check. Yet they persist because hiring teams are under pressure, lack formal procedures, or aren’t trained to spot discrepancies. These aren’t harmless oversights. They are HR hiring mistakes that quietly erode organisational credibility and performance over time.
By failing to vet experience with rigour, employers risk building teams on shaky foundations. The integrity of a workforce cannot be sustained if the hiring process itself lacks scrutiny. A commitment to truth must extend beyond qualifications to include every claim a candidate makes.
It’s Not Rocket Science: Shabby Hiring Practices Are the Real Problem
The persistence of fake degrees in Indonesia and misrepresented professional experience is not due to some insurmountable complexity. Most cases could be prevented through basic diligence. This is not about adding red tape or slowing down recruitment. It is about setting clear, non-negotiable standards that reflect the seriousness of hiring decisions.
Simple, well-defined steps can dramatically reduce risk. Asking candidates to submit original or certified copies of academic qualifications before the offer stage should be standard practice. Institutions can be contacted directly, or third-party verification services used when available. These processes are not perfect, but they are far better than the widespread alternative: assuming documents are authentic without checking.
Work history should receive the same scrutiny. Structured reference calls must be more than polite conversations. At least one referee should have been in a position of authority over the candidate. Questions should go beyond general impressions to uncover real job responsibilities, scope, and outcomes.
A crucial part of this process is asking candidates directly, without ambiguity: What is your highest formally awarded qualification? This question reduces the likelihood of misinterpretation or soft dishonesty.
The reality is that fake degrees in Indonesia often remain undetected not because they are cleverly hidden, but because no one bothers to look closely. When a misrepresented candidate performs adequately, the issue is quietly ignored. But this tolerance has a cost. It signals to others that truth is optional, and that outcomes matter more than integrity.
This is not just an operational failure. It is an ethical one. Poor hiring processes create HR hiring mistakes that compound over time, weakening trust, damaging culture, and exposing organisations to avoidable risk. Prevention is possible. It starts by taking hiring seriously—and treating it as a function of both judgement and principle.
Recruitment Red Flags Are a Culture Problem, Not a Candidate Problem
Hiring is one of the most visible expressions of what a company values. It is not merely about filling an open role, but about setting the tone for culture, ethics, and expectations. When recruitment red flags are ignored, especially in cases involving fake degrees in Indonesia or misrepresented work history, the consequences are rarely contained to one hire. They ripple outward, shaping how truth and trust are perceived across the organisation.
When dishonesty goes unchecked, for example, when someone exaggerates a qualification or invents experience and is still rewarded, it sends a subtle but lasting message. Colleagues observe that performance outweighs honesty, and junior staff learn that bending the truth might be not just tolerated, but effective. This undermines the cultural foundations of integrity and merit. It creates a workplace where HR hiring mistakes aren’t simply administrative errors, but ethical compromises.
To reverse this, companies must adopt an approach rooted in integrity-based hiring. That means welcoming candidates from diverse and unconventional backgrounds, but holding everyone to the same standard of honesty. It means explicitly valuing truthfulness during interviews and throughout the onboarding process.
Hiring managers should be supported and expected to take their role seriously as cultural gatekeepers. They must look beyond polished resumes and be willing to question, probe, and verify. This isn’t about creating fear or making hiring adversarial. It’s about ensuring that every new employee contributes to a culture that is grounded in accountability.
Avoiding HR hiring mistakes is not just a compliance task. It is a strategic and ethical imperative. Building a high-performing team begins with hiring processes that reward competence and character, and that refuse to ignore the quiet warning signs—those red flags that, if left unchecked, compromise the very culture companies are trying to build.
The problem of fake degrees in Indonesia is not new, and it is unlikely to disappear on its own. However, organisations do have control over how they respond. The choice is whether to perpetuate weak systems that allow misrepresentation, or to take meaningful steps toward building hiring practices rooted in truth, accountability, and long-term integrity.
This begins with process. A hiring system that includes even modest checks can make a measurable difference. These are not complex interventions. They are practical safeguards that send a clear message: truth matters here.
Too often, the desire to move quickly trumps the need for diligence. Yet speed at the cost of substance is rarely a sound business decision. Every time a person is hired without proper verification, the organisation accepts a level of risk that is entirely preventable. When a misrepresented degree or fabricated experience goes unnoticed or unchallenged, the cost is cultural.
Hiring is a reflection of what an organisation values. It shows whether integrity is upheld or compromised under pressure. Tolerating recruitment red flags, even passively, is one of the most damaging HR hiring mistakes a company can make. It signals that shortcuts are acceptable and that outcomes justify the means.
To reduce the spread of fake degrees in Indonesia and similar ethical breaches, companies must design hiring practices that prioritise verification without sacrificing fairness. This is not about making the process harder. It is about making it more honest.
What you tolerate in hiring today shapes your culture tomorrow.
Partner with us to build hiring processes that don’t miss the red flags. Our retained search model ensures verification and integrity at every step. Book a discovery call